Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
28 September 2026·7 min read·By Astrid Berg

SKA-Low Tweaks Sunflower Spiral Layout

The SKA-Low telescope had to tweak nature's perfect sunflower spiral after tests found a sensitivity gap at 125 MHz in its antenna layout.

SKA-Low Tweaks Sunflower Spiral Layout

SKA-Low tweaks sunflower spiral after engineers discovered that nature's elegant solution to packing seeds into a flower head creates a serious blind spot when you scale it up to 131,000 radio antennas listening to the early universe.

The Telescope That Borrowed From a Flower

The Square Kilometer Array is the most ambitious radio telescope ever attempted, and its Australian branch is designed to catch radio waves between 50 and 350 MHz. That low-frequency range is where some of the oldest signals in the cosmos live, stretched out by billions of years of cosmic expansion. To capture them, SKA-Low will rely on 512 circular stations, each packed with 256 individual antennas called SKALA4.1s. They look like the old Christmas tree antennas that once sprouted from suburban rooftops.

Spread those stations across 75 square kilometers of the Australian outback and you get more than 131,000 antennas working together. None of them move. Instead, the array uses a technique called beamforming, comparing signals across the configuration to point at different patches of sky electronically. It is a clever trick, and it means the physical arrangement of those antennas matters enormously.

So the international team turned to sunflowers. It's simple. The seeds in a sunflower head follow a pattern known as a Vogel spiral, a mathematically optimized arrangement that packs the most seeds into the least space without clumping. But engineers wondered if the same geometry could keep their antennas evenly spread while avoiding the rigid rows that create data artifacts called grating lobes.

Three Testbeds and a Stubborn Blind Spot

They tested the idea at Inyarrimanha Ilgari Bundara. That's the CSIRO Murchison Radio-Astronomy Observatory. They used specially built testbeds. But the second prototype, Aperture Array Verification System 2, took a different approach entirely, and its 256 antennas were placed in a pseudo-random layout, deliberately scattered to dodge those grating lobes. So it's not the same design. They don't repeat the first layout. We've got 256 antennas here.

SKA-Low Tweaks Sunflower Spiral Layout

Randomness brought its own trouble. By pure chance, several antennas ended up too close together. Since each antenna scatters electromagnetic energy, a neighbor sitting too close can pick up that scattered signal and mistake it for real data. At 55 MHz and 78 MHz, the offending antennas resonated with one another and corrupted the readings.

All the antennas are evenly spread out, ensuring no two are too tightly clumped together, but also aren't in the types of linear pattern that causes the data artifacts.

So the team changed course. AAVS3, the next planned test, took place in 2023 and laid its antennas out in the Vogel spiral itself.

Market Context: According to the SKA Observatory's 2023 Annual Report, a total of 25 construction contracts were awarded across its member states for components and systems, amounting to €213.9 million.
In theory, it offered the best of both worlds. No clumping. No rigid rows. Nature had already solved the packing problem, or so it seemed.

125 MHz and the 2.4 Meter Problem

The test setup was still being built. Simulations flagged something worrying. They predicted a sharp drop in sensitivity at 125 MHz whenever the telescope pointed straight up, exactly where the Milky Way occasionally passes overhead, a prediction that worried the people watching the numbers come in. The engineers built the array anyway. They tested it.

The simulations were right. Sensitivity collapsed at 125 MHz, and the cause was not software or hardware. It was the geometry itself. When researchers analyzed the distances between antennas in the AAVS3 setup, one number kept surfacing: 2.4 meters. That distance matches the wavelength of a 125 MHz radio signal almost exactly. Incoming signals at that frequency from directly overhead caused the antennas to interact, producing destructive interference that cancelled out one another's signals.

The Vogel spiral had done precisely what it was supposed to do. It kept antennas from huddling too close. The flaw was the flip side of that virtue. A sunflower spiral repeats the same spacing over and over again, and repetition is what turns a single unlucky distance into a system-wide blind spot.

Why You Test Before You Build 131,000 Antennas

This is the quiet argument for prototyping at enormous scale. Nobody wants a gap in the sensing capabilities of a telescope designed to probe the cosmic dawn, and finding that gap after deployment would have been a catastrophe. Three rounds of testbeds caught it early.

  • AAVS2 exposed the risks of pseudo-random placement, where chance proximity caused resonance at low frequencies.
  • AAVS3 revealed that an evenly repeating pattern creates destructive interference at a specific wavelength.
  • The fix, a Perturbed Vogel pattern, keeps the sunflower-like spirals but nudges each antenna's position slightly.

The Perturbed Vogel approach keeps antennas apart. It also breaks the even spacing. That spacing caused the 125 MHz cancellation. And it keeps the spirit of the sunflower, that quiet mathematical pattern we've borrowed from nature, while discarding the rigidity that made the original arrangement so predictable and, in this case, so problematic. It's a small fix. But it matters.

What Comes Next for SKA-Low

Deployment will bring more technical challenges. And the team knows it. This particular problem was easy to understand and easy to fix, which is not always how radio astronomy works, because the field often throws up puzzles that resist quick solutions and demand patience. When the full SKA comes online, it will combine SKA-Low with a South African branch of larger dishes monitoring higher wavelengths, forming one instrument spanning two continents.

Until then, the lesson stands alone. Nature's patterns work for nature's problems. A sunflower doesn't care about beamforming. And why would it? SKA-Low tweaks sunflower spiral geometry not because the math was wrong, but because the application demanded something the flower never needed to solve, something the flower, rooted in soil and turning toward the sun, had no reason to ever consider.

Sometimes the best design inspiration still needs an engineer's hand.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the SKA-Low telescope designed to detect, and how many antennas will it use?

The Square Kilometer Array's Australian branch is designed to catch radio waves between 50 and 350 MHz, a low-frequency range where some of the oldest signals in the cosmos live. It will rely on 512 circular stations, each packed with 256 individual antennas called SKALA4.1s, spread across 75 square kilometers of the Australian outback for more than 131,000 antennas working together.

Why did engineers initially turn to the sunflower's Vogel spiral pattern for antenna placement?

The seeds in a sunflower head follow a Vogel spiral, a mathematically optimized arrangement that packs the most seeds into the least space without clumping. Engineers wondered if the same geometry could keep their antennas evenly spread while avoiding the rigid rows that create data artifacts called grating lobes.

What problem did the AAVS3 testbed reveal at 125 MHz, and what caused it?

Simulations predicted a sharp drop in sensitivity at 125 MHz whenever the telescope pointed straight up, and after the engineers built and tested the array, the simulations were right. The cause was the geometry itself: the distance of 2.4 meters between antennas matched the wavelength of a 125 MHz radio signal almost exactly, so incoming signals from directly overhead caused the antennas to interact and produce destructive interference.

How did the AAVS2 prototype's pseudo-random layout cause problems at low frequencies?

AAVS2 placed its 256 antennas in a pseudo-random layout, deliberately scattered to dodge grating lobes, but by pure chance several antennas ended up too close together. At 55 MHz and 78 MHz, the offending antennas resonated with one another and corrupted the readings, because a neighbor sitting too close can pick up scattered electromagnetic energy and mistake it for real data.

What is the Perturbed Vogel pattern, and why was it chosen as the fix?

The Perturbed Vogel pattern keeps the sunflower-like spirals but nudges each antenna's position slightly, so it keeps antennas apart while also breaking the even spacing that caused the 125 MHz cancellation. It preserves the spirit of the sunflower while discarding the rigidity that made the original arrangement so predictable and problematic.

Astrid Berg
Written by
Space Editor

Astrid Berg covers space and astronomy, from missions and launches to the science of the universe. She follows the ongoing effort to explore beyond our planet.

💬 Comments (0)

Sign in to leave a comment.

No comments yet. Be the first!

Advertisement