Why Great Games Stay Hidden: Discoverability Crisis
At the Madeira Games Summit, experts highlighted how discoverability issues make finding quality games increasingly difficult.
Discoverability is the wall. Players hunting for something worth their time often hit it head-on, scrolling through endless digital shelves while the industry keeps producing great games that vanish into a void before anyone even hears they exist. You know that feeling, right? Hours of swiping past thumbnails, nothing catching your eye. It's not because the games don't exist. It's because the systems meant to help you find them are broken, and that brokenness has become the quiet norm we've all learned to accept. But here's the kicker: the fix isn't impossible, it's just ignored.
Why Good Games Stay Hidden
The core issue is that algorithms prioritize volume and short-term engagement over actual quality. They want you to keep clicking and playing, so they push games that mirror what you already like or what is currently trending, and that relentless feedback loop is what really cements the problem. Developers feel forced to chase proven formulas. Originality gets squeezed out. But here's the kicker: if you want to see something truly original, you're usually out of luck, and that's a shame because it's the weird stuff that often matters most.
Michal Bujko, a senior business development manager at Modma Studios, highlighted why this happens at the Madeira Games Summit. Taste gets pushed aside. He noted that the systems are now built to reward metrics rather than taste, and when the focus shifts to data points, distinctive titles get shoved out in favor of whatever is currently gaming the system. So it's a numbers game now. But that doesn't mean the players win.
Algorithms built to surface content are increasingly rewarding volume, familiarity, and short-term engagement over quality or originality. Taste-driven decisions, the kind that once gave unusual games a fighting chance, have been quietly replaced by metrics.
Is The Industry Too Crowded
There's a deeper, uncomfortable question here. Are we simply seeing too many games, and too few of them actually matter? It's a brutal squeeze. When developers are pressured to ship fast just to survive, they often lack the time to take creative risks, so they play it safe and churn out what they know will sell, and that fear of failure becomes a quiet rule that shapes every design meeting. Publishers are equally guilty. They frequently greenlight games based on similar titles that worked in the past, all to minimize their own risk. But that's not a recipe for anything memorable. We've traded surprise for safety. And we can't pretend that doesn't cost us something real.
The result is a market flooded with safe bets. It's a sea of sameness. If you're wondering why everything looks and feels the same, this is why, because the industry has become obsessed with wishlists and day-one numbers, treating games like products to be optimized rather than experiences to be enjoyed. Goodhart's Law warns us that when a measure becomes a target, it stops being a good measure. So companies are missing the mark on what makes a game great. They can't see the forest for the metrics.
What Should Change Now
The window to fix this is still open, but it's closing fast. Wait five years, and many of the best games will be gone, developers who made them will have moved on or shut their doors for good, and the cultural memory of what they achieved will fade into a footnote that no amount of re-releases can truly revive. So the industry needs to rethink its approach from the ground up. But that's a hard truth.

Practical Steps For The Future
The industry needs to move away from relying on platform-driven marketing and start building real relationships with players. Here is what needs to happen to improve the situation:
- Platforms must open their black boxes to provide better data and analytics for developers.
- Companies should bring human curation back into the room to champion unique titles.
- Publishers should focus on building a clear identity and a loyal audience rather than being everything to everyone.
- Developers must start building communities from the moment of conception rather than just at launch.
- Investors need to back long-term creative projects instead of demanding fast returns on safe bets.
Taking Control Of Your Library
You play a role in this too. Seriously, you do. The best games are often the ones that take real creative risks, yet those are the hardest to find under the current rules, so when you support developers who dare to be different, you help signal that taste matters more than a manipulated store ranking.
In five years, we do not want to look back and realize we let all the good stuff slip away.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the main problem described in the article regarding discoverability?
The article describes discoverability as a wall where players struggle to find great games because the systems meant to help them are broken. Algorithms prioritize volume and short-term engagement over actual quality, leaving distinctive titles hidden.
Why do good games stay hidden according to the article?
The article states that algorithms reward volume, familiarity, and short-term engagement, pushing games that mirror what you already like or trends. This feedback loop forces developers to chase proven formulas, squeezing out originality, and taste-driven decisions are replaced by metrics.
What is the deeper question the article raises about the industry's crowdedness?
The article asks if we are seeing too many games and too few that actually matter, leading to a 'sea of sameness.' Developers and publishers play it safe to minimize risk, focusing on wishlists and day-one numbers, which results in a flooded market with safe bets.
What practical steps does the article suggest to improve discoverability?
The article suggests platforms should provide better data and analytics, companies should bring human curation back, publishers should build a clear identity, developers should build communities from conception, and investors should back long-term creative projects instead of fast returns.
How can players take control of their library to help solve the discoverability issue?
The article says players can support developers who take creative risks, signaling that taste matters more than manipulated store rankings. It advises not outspending giants but outthinking them, so good stuff doesn't slip away in five years.
💬 Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first!












